Tl dr: make decisions based on test footage comparisons, not what internet geniuses say. I noticed the remote jack on the side and thought it would be cool to get some time lapses of the resin prints. It's funny that the G7 stands out so much against the other seven cameras and the 1/2.3" BSI CMOS camcorder looks so much better than the other six because it's actually a brand new Panasonic 4K consumer camcorder while the other cameras are 720p/1080p only. I have a Panasonic G7 and recently purchased a resin printer. We constantly hear about how sensor size is such a huge deal and how bigger is always better, yet G7 video consistently seems to make Canon APS-C camera video look mediocre.so I grabbed all the cameras I could find lying around and shot video with every single one, but I didn't reveal the camera used for each shot until the end. One example of test footage I shot is this video that compares sensor sizes in a casual way. Learn how to turn your V-Log footage into a working image that pops Our Conversion LUT from Gamut will give you much better results than Panasonics Nicest. Test footage is always my gold standard for making my video decisions nothing tells you more than comparing your changes using an identical subject. It's a quick test and shouldn't take long. Rented a room for 75 and did this in Blender. The cheapest hospital set we could find cost 2000 a day. If you go CineD it gives a yellow tint but more dynamic range, so use the leeming Lut for Panasonic and you’ll be golden. Do sharpness and noise reduction in post because digital sharpening and ND can sometimes ruin shots. A little breakdown from a shot in my film that I was proud of. I would do Natural with sharpness and Noise reduction at -5. I'd be interested in seeing what you think. Amazing use of light and shadow in The English (2022), cinematographer Arnau Valls Colomer. The NR -5 footage in my testing looks better even when pushed way too hard in this way. Scrub through the footage on each, looking at the "dancing blobs" in darker areas. I'd like for you to shoot three test shots in low light of the same static scene, ISO 800 or up, under-exposed a bit, and with NR -5, 0, and +5, pull each into an editor, and apply a moderate brightness increase, a heavy contrast boost, and a moderate gamma boost. When trying to cut back and forth between the G7 and the BM4k was kind of obnoxious and obvious and a pain to match. With NR -5, the added noise reduces the amount of damage done by the video compression, plus the noise on the G7 is somewhat visually appealing even at ISO 1600 whereas Canon sensor noise is colorful and starts to noticeably detract from the image by ISO 800. I took a shot of a recording studio at NR +5, NR 0, NR -5, and then I aggressively boosted the contrast and gamma until I could see the compression banding and macroblock artifacting (we're talking way further than what you'd do for actual footage unless the footage was all crushed on the left 10% of the histogram). Noise reduction -5 is also a recommendation based on some test footage in low light at ISO 800 with the kit lens. I prefer to have a little more color available than a little less because that extra color difference detail never comes back once gone but can always be thrown out later if desired. I did some tests and Standard produces very slightly stronger colors than Natural and it looked better to me in my test footage when brought into the computer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |